I've been following the story of former Seventh-Day Adventist pastor Ryan Bell and his experiment of living for a year without God. After a period of 
doubt, especially fueled by the feeling that his prayers were pointless, and his 
yearlong break from God, Bell seems poised to make his break final. (At least 
for now.)
Now that last comment wasn't meant to be snarky. However, many of us have 
drifted away from our beliefs about God and the role religion played in our 
lives, only to return in some form later. I'm particularly sympathetic because 
unanswered prayer was a real catalyst for my journey out of faith ... and then 
many years later, for a return back to it. 
Also as with me, a painful marriage breakdown figured prominently in Bell's 
loss of faith. As his prayers seemed to be bouncing off the ceiling and back at 
him, he also contemplated the impossibility of reconciling science and the 
Bible, and also the big one: the problem of evil. I know that road so 
well.
Bell has noticed what it took a little longer for me to fully appreciate, 
in his words:
Being with the atheists, they can have the same sort of obnoxious 
certainty that some Christians have, and I don’t want to be a part of that. It 
feels like I’m stuck in the middle.
That passionate arrogance that I at first found so delicious as I drunk at 
the wells of the great wealth of infidel literature, after a while filled me up 
to the bursting. Perhaps it came quicker for Bell because he actually hung out 
with the skeptics and attended their conventions. I simply dropped out of church 
and continued to read and think. Watching the God debate unfold over the 
internet really opened my eyes. I was amazed as I watched atheists parrot the 
cliches of their superstars, not unlike the way intellectually lazy religious 
believers repeated, often verbatim, the pop-theology of their heroes.
It remains to be seen how Ryan Bell navigates his way through all this. 
After all, a year is a drop in the bucket compared to the many years he spent in 
the faith. 
My own journey took me to Deism for a while. Later I went into an agnostic 
mode, one in which I stayed for many years. But deep down inside there was 
something in me that never died. If I couldn't go back to biblical faith, 
perhaps I could merge that something inside with my current more 
science-based understanding of reality. Voila! My pantheistic phase. (Needless 
to say the actually jorney was not a neat as I present it here as a 
retrospective; there jumps and starts and falls back and such.)  
When I was in my agnostic phase I was very much impressed with the writings 
of two atheists in particular, Bertrand Russell and Antony Flew. Both of those 
men were once believers or at least molded in their youth by the Christian 
faith. Russell never returned to God, but he seemed never to have found exactly 
what he was looking for either. Flew, on the other hand, and surprisingly enough 
knowing his writings as I do, did find his way back. And that really got me to 
thinking about my own journey.  
Blaise Pascal wrote, "In faith there is enough light for those who want to 
believe and enough shadows to blind those who don't." The problems that lead us 
to doubt can be offset with possible solutions. Yet it seems to take something 
more to push us over one side of the line or the other. 
It was at that point that I began to consider the sensus divinitatis (or 
sense of divinity) a little more carefully. Overwhelmingly down through history 
humans have been religious. I don't think that is because of an ignorance that 
needed to be driven out of the human soul. I think it is there because the 
Creator placed it there. Certainly it can be stifled, perhaps totally 
eradicated. But many is the atheist that has made a statement to the effect that 
they wish they could still believe, but alas, their devotion to reason has shut 
off that door. Is that wish the religious sense causing discord inside?
I wish Mr. Bell all the best as he travels along his journey. I recognize 
that road.
 
 
Hi Doug. I have also been following his journey. He really gave up a lot because of his questioning. I also agree with your summary of the Pascal quote. Hope you have a great new year.
ReplyDeleteHi Sylvia. It will be interesting to see how Bell's journey goes. I dislike a faith that puts more obstacles in the way than is practical. A good, healthy dose of "I don't know" goes a long way, at least it seems to me.
DeleteYes I'll be interested to see if we hear any more about him, and if so if he stays where he's at now.
ReplyDeleteFinding answers which satisfy sometimes takes a long time. It looks as if now he is finding his new world intoxicating. That happens. But for some of us it gets old and seems hollow. We'll see, I suppose.
DeleteI for one have grown fond of shadows. Far from being blinded, they helped me see.
ReplyDeleteI think Mr. Bell is in for hell amongst his former believers.
I'm quite sure he is. And that is the case when one is "converting" from either direction. Nevertheless, we have to be true to ourselves.
DeleteAgreed. And, I think doing so is one of the bravest things we can do for ourselves. But as you know, it often comes at a great price for some.
Delete