This past weekend Bill "Religulous" Maher let loose with a rant aimed at
the upcoming Noah movie starring Russell Crowe:
It’s about a psychotic mass murderer who gets away with it, and
his name is God. Genesis says God was so angry with himself for screwing up when
he made mankind so flawed, that he sent the flood to kill everyone, everyone –
men, women, children, babies. What kind of tyrant punishes everyone just to get
back at the few he’s mad at? I mean, besides Chris Christie.
After beginning by lamenting that this a "stupid country" because 60
percent of American think of Noah's Ark as "literally true," he goes on to treat
the story as if indeed it were history. (And along the way he takes a few
liberties with the way the Bible describes it.)
I think the problem is not so much stupidity as it is a slavish devotion to
the Bible as God's literal Word to humankind, coupled with an appallingly weak
grasp of science.
Of course there are some real logical problems in trying to take Noah's
story literally. Those who think of the Bible as God's inerrant revelation to
man will ignore these away by alluding to God's "miraculous" power.
The rest of us will continue to think it illogical as history but perhaps
meaningful as myth.
Still, for those of us who don't the view the Bible as the fundamentalist
or evangelical Christian does, the way the Old Testament often includes innocent
creatures (babies and animals) in the total destruction of sinful nations and
their property does not float well into our Western ears and way of thinking
about individual rights.
It should not.
We can only read the Bible with its historical setting in mind. As with
other matters such as slavery and treating women as chattel, we know these
things are wrong now and always were wrong.
Enlightened minds read these things with shame. We look back on the Old
Testament animal sacrificial system, realizing it is only a step above human
sacrifice to appease an offended deity, and feel shame that so many of our
ancestors stumbled so badly along the road to enlightenment.
Yet it is only fair to acknowledge that women as a whole have only been
allowed to vote in our country for less than a century. Black citizens were
enslaved a century and a half ago and still disenfranchised and only slowly
being allowed into the full rights of U.S. citizenship in my lifetime.
Moreover, sadly, war is still waged by nations - including ours - claiming
to be in the will of God - just as bloody, cruel, and violent, as it was in
ancient times.
The God I'm coming to believe in is not psychotic. But we humans are still
stumbling and often still making God in our image as we do. Not at all
a compliment to the concept of God.
I think a lot of christians miss that there is significant development in understanding within the Bible - from the Law to the Prophets, and from the Old to the New Testament. So trying to believe it all equally requires a lot of juggling (and a little fooling oneself). I think the truth is that a christian starts with Jesus and holds onto what fits with that, and accepts as superseded what doesn't. I don't believe Jesus was psychotic, therefore .....
ReplyDeleteI think we must - believer and unbeliever alike - take the Bible with consideration of its setting. Some atheists want to (for greater effect, as with Maher) read it in the light of modernity. I don't think that's fair at all.
DeleteI agree, Doug
ReplyDeleteI think Bill is here to shake up the religious right. Personally, I don't care for him, but am strangely drawn to many things he says. At times, those things make me go, "Hmmmm".
ReplyDeleteSometimes his arrogance grates on my nerves.
Delete