As I was standing in line at the grocery store Friday awaiting my turn, I
noticed the latest issue of Reader's Digest in the magazine rack. The RD makes
good bedtime reading for me. The short stories and articles are just the thing
for me to read until I'm drowsy and ready to turn in for real.
I couldn't help noticing an item in the section Your True
Stories in 100 Words. It was submitted by Grace Napier of Greeley,
Colorado, who feels she has a guardian angel watching over.
Guardian angels is a subject I once ridiculed. That was due to my
then rigid literalist mindset, as well an ignorance of the imaginal realm. Now
I'm more inclined to listen to those who have stories to tell.
Grace Napier relates that she was on her way to work and exiting her yard
when "a firm hand restrained my right shoulder, shoving me left." This took her
on a longer route "where traffic was not moving."
That sounds bad, but Grace later learned that there had been a fatal
traffic accident along the route she had originally planned to take. "I would
have been that accident," she writes, crediting her guardian angel with
saving her life.
I would assume Napier is a Christian and that worldview is what gives form
to her story.
If my credulity is longer strained by such stories, it is because I have
given serious consideration to the times in my own life when I sensed a guiding
force. I think also of the warnings unheeded that I lived to regret.
I don't know whether "guardian angel" is literal or a personification of God (or both), but I have certainly felt guided and protected on occasions. I have written about one such event here.
ReplyDeleteI think the modern scientific materialist worldview can only ridicule this concept. If by literal we mean something that would take the drawing I used to illustrate my post as an example instead of a symbolic representation, I'm not a literalist. But I am an idealist and believe in the primacy of mind.
Delete