At selected locations in the US the Living Without Religion Organization
has put up billboards with the following message:
If people follow the link on the billboard they will be taken to a simple
statement of Secular Humanism. I'm not sure anyone - believer or unbeliever -
could doubt that millions do live without belief in God or religion.
On the other hand, it could truly be said that millions more than that live
happily with religion. I'm quite sure the majority of believers would
suggest one might be happier with religion - but that is a matter of
opinion.
In looking over the statement in defense of Secular Humanism - most of
which as an agnostic believer I embrace - there are a few of their points that
stuck out to me.
There was this:
We see each other through humanist eyes—as fellow human beings—as
cousins—equal in dignity and deserving of compassion and
respect.
I agree wholeheartedly with that. However, I'm not sure why that should be
taken as more than an ipse dixit statement. I see no slam-dunk reason
to regard all humans as "equal in dignity" apart from belief in a Creator who
made humans either in His image or perhaps as the highest expression of his
work. For example, skeptic James Randi's recent comments concerning so-called
Social Darwinism
But in general, I think that Darwinism, survival of the fittest,
should be allowed to act itself out. As long as it doesn’t interfere with me and
other sensible, rational people who could be affected by it. Innocent people, in
other words.
may be offensive to the sentiments of most of us, but is it
illogical?
Then there is the following point at the aforementioned link:
We accept that our lives will end, but we find hope and take great
joy in knowing that life keeps going.
Again I find no fault with that sentiment. But again I wonder why that
follows, why it would be a general rule that anyone should take "great joy" in
the mere fact that life goes on. Wouldn't it be just as logical that, if our
lives are limited to this sphere of existence, one should attempt to grab all
the pleasure this life has to offer, up to and including what Rand called "the
virtue of selfishness"?
As regards the matter of survival of death, I am again agnostic (but
hopeful!). But I find the concept makes some sense within a framework of belief
in God. Perhaps the way our second president, John Adams, put it in a letter to
fellow former president Thomas Jefferson:
If there was nothing beyond mortal life, you might be ashamed of
your Maker, and compare him to a little Girl amusing herself, her Brothers and
Sisters by blowing Bubbles in Soap Sudds.
Therefore, I could not personally rise to the level of the Secular
Humanist, who according to their statement of outlook says:
We do not fear the unknown but rather take courage from the
wondrous discoveries that have already been made.
Like most of us I do have a bit of fear of the unknown. That isn't an
unnatural thing, and I wonder how many Humanists proudly say that but still
secretly harbor their apprehensiveness.
For me a simple belief in a Cosmic Mind brings me hope and thus more
happiness than mere nonbelief could. I think that is true of the millions more
who are happy because of their belief.
"For me a simple belief in a Cosmic Mind brings me hope and thus more happiness than mere nonbelief could."
ReplyDeleteAgreed!
Guess I am a bit of an optimist after all.
Delete