Since my youth I have been fascinated with the men who held the office of
President of the United States, especially those of the long past. I love
history and I love attempting to place these men into the context of their times
even as I wonder how they might fare leading this country during modern
times.
Abraham Lincoln established himself as my personal favorite president. His
wisdom, character, soundness of judgment and courage always inspired me. I have
a good selection of programs and movies about him in my DVD collection and
always find myself profoundly moved when watching them.
Lincoln, whose opinions on religion is controversial at best, seemed, at
least according to his own words, to have been something of a fatalist. While
the case has been convincingly (in my opinion at least) made that in his younger
days he was a critic of organized religion in the vein of Thomas Pain, his faith
commitment in his later years as president cannot be dismissed without making
the man out to have been a total hypocrite. Something I would have real trouble
believing.
His fatalism (arguably influenced by his early exposure to
Calvinistic Baptists) somehow allowed him to view the Civil War as possibly part
of the divine scheme of things, but he was determined to lead the United States
to a conclusion of it and a reconciliation of the warring factions:
Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration
which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the
conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each
looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both
read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against
the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's
assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let
us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered.
That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe
unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but
woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American
slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs
come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to
remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe
due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure
from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe
to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war
may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth
piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be
sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another
drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be
said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous
altogether." (Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, March 4,
1865.)
For many of us who are not fans of the most recent President Bush and his
invasion of Iraq under the claim of divine direction, who object to politicians
and world leaders who use religion this way as a pretext for warring, it might
prove comforting to remember how Abraham Lincoln led during the great distress
of overseeing the country through it's terrible Civil War.
From painter Francis Bicknell Carpenter's book, published in 1866, we
have preserved the following example:
No nobler reply ever fell from the
lips of ruler, than that uttered by President Lincoln in response to
the clergyman who ventured to say, in his presence,
that he hoped " the Lord
was on our side."
"I am not at all concerned about
that," replied Mr. Lincoln, "for I know that the
Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and
prayer that this nation should be on the
Lord's side."
As for that terrible institution that was back of it all, the evil of human
slavery, Lincoln appealed to the Golden Rule in stating his opposition: In May
1864, Lincoln replied to a letter from a Baptist delegation with the
following:
When, a year or two ago, those professedly holy men of the South,
met in the semblance of prayer and devotion, and, in the name of Him who said
``As ye would all men should do unto you, do ye even so unto them'' appealed to
the christian world to aid them in doing to a whole race of men, as they would
have no man do unto themselves, to my thinking, they condemned and insulted God
and His church, far more than did Satan when he tempted the Saviour with the
Kingdoms of the earth.
One thing I am well aware of is that Lincoln was a master politician.
Peppering his writings and speeches with biblical references, the best known
religious text of the American people, was undeniably a great method of stirring
the emotions of the people. Still, back of it all, I detect a simple faith in
the man that emphasized the best aspect of religion: the right should be
the basis of the conduct of our lives regarding our fellow
humans.
If, and I do preface it with if, we accurately know anything that Jesus stated while he lived, it was the very simple statement of his that sticks with me the most. Love God (in whatever state you choose to find him), and love others as much as yourself.
ReplyDeleteTo me, that is simple faith. It seems to be the simple faith of Lincoln.
I like simple faith. And I like Abraham Lincoln. He also left us a rich legacy of thoughts that are still worth mulling over in our day!
Delete